Except in rare cases, it is impossible to extinguish a shipboard fire by （）.

A . MF/HF B . SART C . EPIRB D . any of A, B, C

A . steamer will drift stern downwind B . tug will drift faster than the steamer C . tug should approach stern to D . tug should approach from downwind

A . open-type B . hermetic C . A and B D . None of the above

A . West or northwest B . Northeast C . Southeast D . North

A . dropping off B . jettison C . throwing away D . taking off

A . removing the heal B . removing the oxygen C . removing the fuel D . interrupting the chain reactio

A．我不认为她会不安，但我还是去看看她，以免她不安。 B．我认为她不会不安，但万一她不安，我会去看她的。 C．我认为她不会不安，但以防万一，我还是去看她一下。 D．虽然我认为她不会不安，但我还是要去看看她，以免她不安。

A、 firms should build products and services that protect privacy. B、 firms should increase the transparency of their data collection. C、 firms should require consumer consent and provide clear options to opt out of data<br class="markdown_return">Collection. D、 firms should limit the length of time that any personal data is stored to six months or less. E、 consumers should be able to review and contest the accuracy and completeness of data.

A．A.melt B．B.must melt C．C.would melt D．D.had melted

By opting not to take the case, the high court effectively endorsed a lower court's decision that a Colorado company that posts ratings of health plans on the Internet could be sued for defamation in a Washington court. The lower court ruling is one of several that makes it easier for plaintiffs to sue Web site operators in their own jurisdictions, rather than where the operators maintain a physical presence. The case involved a defamation suit filed by Chehalis, Wash.-based Northwest Healthcare Alliance against Lakewood, Colo.-based Healthgrades.com The Alliance sued in Washington federal court after Healthgrades.com posted a negative ranking of Northwest Healthcare's home health services on the Internet. Healthgrades.com argued that it should not be subject to the jurisdiction of a court in Washington because its publishing operation is in Colorado. Observers said the fact that the Supreme Court opted not to hear the case only clouds the legal situation for Web site operators. Geoff Stewart, a partner at Jones Day in Washington, D.C., said that the Supreme Court eventually must act on the issue, as Internet sites that rate everything from automobile dealerships to credit offers could scale back their offerings to avoid lawsuits originating numerous jurisdictions. Online publishers also might have to worry about being dragged into lawsuits in foreign courts, said Dow Lohnes &amp; Albertson attorney Jon Hart, who has represented the Online News Association. "The much more difficult problems for U.S. media companies arise when claims are brought in foreign countries over content published in the United States", Hart said. Hart cited a recent case in which an Australian court ruled that Dow Jones must appear in a Victoria, Australia court to defend its publication of an article on the U.S.—based Walt Street Journal Web site. According to Hart, the potential chilling effect of those sorts of jurisdictional decisions is substantial. "I have not yet seen publishers holding back on what they otherwise publish because they're afraid they're going to get sued in another country, but that doesn't mean it won't happen if we see a rash of U.S. libel cases against U.S. media companies being brought in foreign countries", he said. Until the high court decides to weigh in directly on this issue, Web site operators that offer information and services to users located outside of their home states must deal with a thorny legal landscape, said John Morgan, a partner at Perkins Coie LLP and an expert in Internet law. The author seems to believe that the Supreme Court's decision ______. A．can cause operators to issue balanced health plan ratings. B．renders correct legal decisions in other cases impossible. C．might put Web site operators at a legal disadvantage. D．brings about a series of debates on Internet operations.

A．normally B．seldom C．frequently D．usually

A、agricultures B、alternatives C、aptitude D、attitude

A) very B) quite C) too D) so

Express I(X；Y)in term of α and interpret the special case α=1．

That evening I went to have dinner with my aunt and uncle. They had also invited a young woman so that there would be four people at the table. Her face was familiar. I was quite sure that we had not met before, but I couldn't remember where I had seen her. In the course of conversation, however, the young woman happened to mention that she had lost her wallet that afternoon. All at once I realized where I had seen her. She was the young girl in the photograph, although she was now much older. She was very surprised, of course, when I was able to describe her wallet to her. Then I explained that I had recognized her from the photograph I had found in the wallet. My uncle insisted on going to the police station immediately to claim the wallet. As the police sergeant handed it over, he said that it was amazing that I had not only found the wallet, but also the person who had lost it. The wallet which the writer found ______. A．was empty B．had some money in it C．had a few coins and a photograph in it D．had an old photograph in it

是 否

A.finding B.having found C.to find D.to have found

A．glare B．shine C．faint D．dazzle

A．heroic couplet B．blank verse C．sonnet D．free verse